Setting the Table for Impeachment
The Art of War
By Sun Tzu
VII. Maneuvering
The difficulty of tactical maneuvering consists in turning the devious into the direct, and misfortune into gain.
4. Thus, to take a long and circuitous route, after enticing the enemy out of the way, and though starting after him, to contrive to reach the goal before him, shows knowledge of the artifice of deviation
Setting the Table for Impeachment
By Black Cell
Many Democrats have wanted to either condemn or impeach the president & vice president for manipulating American people into a war that repugs have used for their own personal gain.
With the debate surrounding the condemnation of the moveon.org ad, Fighting Dems now has that opportunity.
The most impressive thing elected Dems can do, is to push for the condemnation of the moveon.org ad in the House, while pushing the condemnation of the Bush administration-for their manipulation of the hard facts that has us fighting a war that is killing off some of our best trained military personal.
It is great to see that Repugblicans has gotten Moderates & Independents to see their perspective on perusing the condemnation to the moveon.org ad. it opens the door for the Democrats to pursue our passionate desire to condemn the Bu$h administration for their conduct during the build up to the war in Iraq.
I know that the Bu$h administration have their weak excuses for telling the lies that they told, but the American people are not buying them.
I must repeat that Dems must use HARD FACTS to undermine the repugs attempt to inspire their base by condemning the moveon.org ad.
Our friends in the media will only follow our lead, if we pursue the president in cleaver ways. If it bleeds it leads & the repugs have drew blood. It is now time to affectively countering the repugs attack by not licking our wounds, but drawing blood.
This is a battle for the hearts & minds of the American people don’t, lose it.
Fighting Dems 13
Repugs Thugs 7
It is only the first quarter don't lose the game!
- BLACK CELL's blog
- Login or register to post comments

Be part of the Draft Gore '08 campaign!

weak kneed Democrats have got to go.
It's time to kick the weak kneed, pussy whipped Democrats out of office and elect a new breed. Our country and the world is in serious trouble. Let's get Al Gore in there and have him kick some ass!
Excuse me please
Don't we still have the right to free press in this country? Or has Bush and his cohorts conspired another executive priviledge?
We Do, Unless...
Unless I've woken up in a parallel universe where free speech is not longer law! Unfortunately, I am awake - wide awake, and I can see and feel the pressure to silence any and all dissent.
The Repugs are using the same tired old spin to steer the Dems using fear. Bush even said it yesterday(?) and I paraphrase here, that this ad was not just an attack on the General but on the entire military - just like 'if you cut off funding, you hurt our troops'. What a load of BS! Any time they have to turn things back on someone, they accuse us of failing to support the troops, or they call us un-American, and then they tell us to leave if we don't like it. It's infuriating!
There would be no reason to mistrust this man had this administration been an honest one - what else would we expect from liars, but lies. If it walks like a Bushie, and talks like a Bushie...
The MoveOne.org ad was just the push of the envelope that was needed. Without going to extremes, we become pushovers. It doesn't mean everyone has to agree, but everyone (Dems and Repugs) should be willing to fight for the right to say it!
Yes, we have the right to free press and free speech, however the Bush administration is doing everything it possibly can to quash those freedoms into the dirt! The longer people are silent the worse it will get - and it is clearly getting worse! That much is crystal clear!
HOMELAND INSECURITY
HOMELAND INSECURITY
Sheikdom shakedown: Dubai moves on Nasdaq
Arab ownership of U.S. stock exchange raises flag in Congress
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: September 20, 2007
4:14 p.m. Eastern
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com
In a complex set of transactions, Dubai is moving to acquire 19.9 percent of the Nasdaq in New York, placing the Arab government in an ownership position of the key U.S. stock exchange and raising concerns in Congress.
As a result of the transaction, Dubai also will acquire 28 percent of the London Stock Exchange, one of the oldest and largest in the world.
The transaction is being made through Borse Dubai, a holding company 100-percent owned by the government of the Emirate of Dubai and controlled by Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum, the head of the Dubai ruling family.
According to its website, Borse Dubai was created Aug. 6 as the holding company for Dubai Financial Market and Dubai International Financial Exchange in a move to consolidate the Dubai government's two stock exchanges "as well as current investments in other exchanges, expanding Dubai's position as a global capital market hub."
(Story continues below)
The announcement set off a firestorm of criticism in Washington, prompting President Bush to comment today in a news conference, "We're going to take a good look at it, as to whether or not it has any national security implications involved in the transaction. I'm comfortable with the process to go forward."
On July 26, Bush signed into law the Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007, a law passed after last year's controversy over the effort by Dubai Ports World to acquire London-based Peninsular & Oriental Steam Navigation, an international ports operating firm that would have given Dubai control of operations in up to 22 U.S. ports.
The Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007 was passed to strengthen the examination requirements of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, a highly secretive bureaucratic panel constituted by the Treasury Department to pass verdict on the national security implications of foreign investments in the U.S.
In a letter today, Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., urged Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson to conduct the Borse Dubai CFIUS review under the standards imposed by the Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007, even though most of the requirements of the new law do not take effect until later this fall.
Schumer chairs the Joint Economic Committee, composed of 10 members each from the Senate and House of Representatives.
"Nasdaq is not just any exchange, but one of the world's largest," Schumer wrote Paulson. "With approximately 3,200 companies, it lists more companies and, on average, trades more shares per day than any other U.S. market."
Schumer's letter posed five specific questions for Paulson:
What national security concerns are raised by allowing a foreign government to own U.S. financial exchanges?
Specifically, with respect to Dubai, are there national security concerns about this particular country's influence or control over a U.S. exchange?
U.S. exchanges are a critical asset to our national economic infrastructure. What implications would foreign government control or influence have on our economic security?
U.S. economic security depends on continued competitiveness in a global financial market. What impact will this transaction have on U.S. financial competitiveness?
If national and economic security concerns can be satisfied, should restrictions be placed on this transaction to limit Dubai's control and influence over U.S. exchanges?
The Department of the Treasury could not be reached for immediate comment.
Double Hitter
HOMELAND INSECURITY
Dubai bought 2 aircraft companies from Carlyle
Arab government-controlled aerospace firm owns repairer of jet engines
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: September 21, 2007
2:14 p.m. Eastern
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com
Sheik Ahmad bin Saeed al Maktoum, head of the Dubai ruling family
Dubai Aerospace Enterprise, a company controlled by the government of Dubai, has purchased two aviation companies from the Carlyle Group, the Washington-based private investment consortium with close financial ties to the Bush family and former officials of the administrations of President George H.W. Bush and President Reagan, including former Secretary of State James Baker.
According to Bloomberg and Reuters, the buyout transaction last month, valued at $1.5 billion, involved Dubai Aerospace acquiring the Arizona-based Landmark Aviation, a company that repairs jet engines, and the Canadian company Standard Aero Holdings, Inc., which repairs military and private jet engines.
Earlier this year, Dubai Aerospace also moved to acquire factories put up for sale by European airplane maker Airbus.
(Story continues below)
According to Aviation World, Dubai Aerospace was launched in February 2006 with plans to invest $20 billion to establish over the next few years wholly owned investments in airplane manufacturing and engineering, as well as airport operations and services.
Dubai Aerospace Enterprise is chaired by Sheik Ahmad bin Saeed al Maktoum, head of the Dubai ruling family.
As WND reported yesterday, Dubai, one of the seven emirates in the United Arab Emirates, has announced a complex transaction resulting in Borse Dubai, another government-controlled entity, owning 20 percent of the U.S. Nasdaq stock exchange and 28 percent of the London Stock Exchange.
WND reported today Mubadala, a wholly owned investment arm of the Abu Dhabi government, bought a 7.5 percent share of the Carlyle Group in a transaction in which the deal price was struck at a 10 percent discount to a valuation of $20 billion for all of the Carlyle Group.
Abu Dhabi is the largest of the seven emirates of the United Arab Emirates and the capital.
WND also reported Dubai International Capital, a private equity investment capital firm that is a wholly owned subsidiary of Dubai Holdings, has commonly participated in co-investments with the Carlyle Group.
In reports filed with the federal government, Landmark Aviation acknowledged making a $400,000 payment in the first half of this year to the Washington-based law firm of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld for lobbying activities on behalf of the firm.
Robert S. Strauss, a co-founder of the firm, was chairman of the Democratic National Committee from 1973 to 1976. In 1977, he entered the Cabinet of President Jimmy Carter, serving as special trade representative.
According to the Carlyle Group website, Landmark is also the second largest general aviation facility operator in North America, with a premier network of 35 fixed-based operations that provide refueling, hangar rental, parking, aircraft cleaning, catering and other services for business aircraft operators.
According to Bloomberg, Dubai Aerospace earlier this month abandoned an offer to buy a controlling 51 percent stake in New Zealand's Auckland International Airport for a $1.8 billion investment, after political objections by two city council groups that owned a 23 percent interest in the airport.
Auckland Airport handles an estimated 70 percent of all international arrivals in New Zealand.
On Sept. 18, Carlyle announced the appointment of David Marchick, a partner at the Washington-based law firm Covington & Burling, to head its regulatory dealings with politicians around the globe.
In the Clinton administration, Marchick worked as deputy assistant secretary of state for transportation affairs and deputy assistant for trade policy at the State Department. He also worked in the office of the U.S. Trade Representative.
Founding Fathers of the United States
Are there any politicians who want to be like the best of our founding fathers?
Delegates who signed
Abraham Baldwin
Richard Bassett
Gunning Bedford, Jr.
John Blair
William Blount
David Brearly
Jacob Broom
Pierce Butler
Daniel Carroll
George Clymer
Jonathan Dayton
John Dickinson
William Few
Thomas Fitzsimons
Benjamin Franklin
Nicholas Gilman
Nathaniel Gorham
Alexander Hamilton
Jared Ingersoll
Daniel of St. Thomas Jenifer
William Samuel Johnson
Rufus King
John Langdon
William Livingston
James Madison
James McHenry
Thomas Mifflin
Gouverneur Morris
Robert Morris
William Paterson
Charles Cotesworth Pinckney
Charles Pinckney
George Read
John Rutledge
Roger Sherman
Richard Dobbs Spaight
George Washington (president of the Convention)
Hugh Williamson
James Wilson
William Jackson (Secretary)
live free or die trying!
[edit] 16 Delegates who did not sign
William Richardson Davie
Oliver Ellsworth
Elbridge Gerry
William Houston
William Houstoun
John Lansing, Jr.
Alexander Martin
Luther Martin
George Mason
James McClurg
John Francis Mercer
William Pierce
Edmund Randolph
Caleb Strong
George Wythe
Robert Yates
P.S. I wanted to put the Bu$h Crime Family. But, I might get condemned.
might get condemed.
Bin Laden: Goal is to bankrupt U.S.
Al-Jazeera releases full transcript of al Qaeda leader's tape
(CNN) -- The Arabic-language network Al-Jazeera released a full transcript Monday of the most recent videotape from Osama bin Laden in which the head of al Qaeda said his group's goal is to force America into bankruptcy.
Al-Jazeera aired portions of the videotape Friday but released the full transcript of the entire tape on its Web site Monday.
"We are continuing this policy in bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy. Allah willing, and nothing is too great for Allah," bin Laden said in the transcript.
He said the mujahedeen fighters did the same thing to the Soviet Union in Afghanistan in the 1980s, "using guerrilla warfare and the war of attrition to fight tyrannical superpowers."
"We, alongside the mujahedeen, bled Russia for 10 years until it went bankrupt and was forced to withdraw in defeat," bin Laden said.
He also said al Qaeda has found it "easy for us to provoke and bait this administration."
"All that we have to do is to send two mujahedeen to the furthest point east to raise a piece of cloth on which is written al Qaeda, in order to make generals race there to cause America to suffer human, economic and political losses without their achieving anything of note other than some benefits for their private corporations," bin Laden said.
Al-Jazeera executives said they decided to post the entire speech because rumors were circulating that the network omitted parts that "had direct threats toward specific states, which was totally untrue."
"We chose the most newsworthy parts of the address and aired them. The rest was used in lower thirds in graphics format," said one official.
U.S. intelligence officials Monday confirmed that the transcript made public Monday by Al-Jazeera was a complete one.
As part of the "bleed-until-bankruptcy plan," bin Laden cited a British estimate that it cost al Qaeda about $500,000 to carry out the attacks of September 11, 2001, an amount that he said paled in comparison with the costs incurred by the United States.
"Every dollar of al Qaeda defeated a million dollars, by the permission of Allah, besides the loss of a huge number of jobs," he said. "As for the economic deficit, it has reached record astronomical numbers estimated to total more than a trillion dollars.
The total U.S. national debt is more than $7 trillion. The U.S. federal deficit was $413 billion in 2004, according to the Treasury Department.
"It is true that this shows that al Qaeda has gained, but on the other hand it shows that the Bush administration has also gained, something that anyone who looks at the size of the contracts acquired by the shady Bush administration-linked mega-corporations, like Halliburton and its kind, will be convinced.
"And it all shows that the real loser is you," he said. "It is the American people and their economy."
As for President Bush's Iraq policy, Bin Laden said, "the darkness of black gold blurred his vision and insight, and he gave priority to private interests over the public interests of America.
"So the war went ahead, the death toll rose, the American economy bled, and Bush became embroiled in the swamps of Iraq that threaten his future," bin Laden said.
U.S. government officials said Friday that the tape appeared to be authentic and recently made. It was the first videotaped message from the al Qaeda leader in nearly three years.
Canadian Dollar Trades Equal to U.S. for First Time Since 1976
Sept. 20 (Bloomberg) -- Canada's dollar traded equal to the U.S. currency for the first time in three decades, capping a five-year run on the back of booming demand for the nation's commodities.
The Canadian dollar rose as high as $1.0008, before retreating to 99.87 U.S. cents at 4:16 p.m. in New York. It has soared 62 percent from a record low of 61.76 U.S. cents in 2002. The U.S. dollar fell as low as 99.93 Canadian cents today. The Canadian currency last closed above $1 on Nov. 25, 1976, when Pierre Trudeau was Canada's prime minister.
The move to parity marks a milestone for a currency dubbed the loonie for the bird that adorns the nation's one-dollar coin. Parity also symbolizes Canada's emerging clout in a world economy increasingly short of the energy, grains and metals the country produces.
``It's a long time since those heady days,'' said Frank McKenna, 59, deputy chairman of Toronto-Dominion Bank, the country's third-biggest lender, and a former ambassador to the U.S. ``Canadians should understand that this is a badge of confidence in our country.''
Canada, the world's eighth-biggest economy, has benefited from rising demand for copper, gold, wheat and oil from neighboring U.S. and emerging economies such as India and China. The country is the world's largest producer of uranium, the second-biggest exporter of natural gas, and sits on the largest pool of oil reserves outside the Middle East. Canada is also the world's second-largest exporter of wheat, which rose to a record this month.
Commodities Soar
The Reuters/Jefferies CRB Index of global commodities has risen 69 percent since January 2002 on growing demand from China and other Asian economies, boosting the value of Canadian exports and triggering investment in new mines and other resource projects. Canada's economy will be the fastest-growing among the Group of Seven nations in 2008, with an expected pace of 2.9 percent, the International Monetary Fund estimated in April.
Foreign investors are rushing into the country to tap into the boom, boosting demand for the Canadian currency. Canadian companies have been involved in announced takeovers worth $287 billion this year, surpassing the record $275 billion for all of 2006, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The dollar almost gained a full cent on July 12, the day Rio Tinto Group offered $38.1 billion for Montreal-based Alcan Inc., the world's No. 2 aluminum producer.
Canada, which has run 10 consecutive annual budget surpluses, is using the world's growing reliance on its commodities to bolster its stature globally.
Energy Power
Prime Minister Stephen Harper has called the North American country an ``energy superpower,'' and asserted sovereignty in the Arctic, pitting Canada's claims against Russia and the U.S. Harper also has sought to increase Canada's influence in Latin America by signing trade deals and touting the country as an alternative energy source to Venezuela.
``Parity heralds Canada's reemergence on the world's economic stage,'' said Michael Gregory, a senior economist at BMO Capital Markets in Toronto.
To be sure, the stronger Canadian currency comes at a cost to some areas of the economy, from lumber producers in British Columbia to carmakers in Ontario. The stronger dollar makes their products more expensive abroad.
``We've got a speculative bubble in the Canadian dollar,'' said Stephen Jarislowsky, chief executive officer of Montreal- based Jarislowsky Fraser Ltd., which manages about $62.6 billion. ``Parity will be an unmitigated disaster for Canada. It spells -- in the not too distant future -- a major recession, at least in eastern Canada if not the rest of the country.''
Job Cuts
The Forest Products Association of Canada, an Ottawa-based lobby group, estimates 110,000 jobs have been lost in the manufacturing industry since 2002, almost a third of them in the forest sector.
The surging currency also reflects U.S. dollar weakness against all major currencies. The U.S. dollar has posted losses over the past five years against all but one of the 16 major currencies tracked by Bloomberg on concern about the nation's budget and trade imbalances, and a housing slump.
``We are going to feel the effects of the downturn in the U.S. housing market, because we are an exporter of housing materials,'' Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said in an interview in Ottawa. ``But overall we have a strong Canadian economy, our economic fundamentals are the strongest in the G-7. So we are well positioned to weather this storm.''
Offset Slump
So far, growing demand for commodities and other industrial goods produced in Canada is more than offsetting the slump in manufacturing. Canada has generated 32 consecutive quarters of current account surpluses, with receipts from outside Canada exceeding payments sent abroad by C$187 billion ($187 billion) over the period. The jobless rate remains at a 33-year low of 6 percent.
``In a resource economy, and Canada is still largely a resource economy, you'll find the exchange rate will move up and down with commodities,'' said Neil Camarta, senior vice president of oil sands at Petro-Canada, the country's third-biggest oil and gas producer.
The country is also lessening its dependence on the slowing U.S. economy, with U.S. shipments accounting for 76 percent of exports in July, down from 85 percent in 2002. Exports to the U.S. fell 3.3 percent in July, yet were up 29 percent to the European Union and 65 percent to China.
And while the U.S. Federal Reserve cut interest rates on Sept. 18 to revive growth, Canada's central bank raised rates in July and may increase them again this year to stem inflation, futures contracts show.
Good Indication
``Currency markets are a good indication relative to the country,'' said Richard Waugh, chief executive officer of Toronto-based Bank of Nova Scotia, the No. 2 bank. Waugh predicted in a March interview that the currency would reach parity.
For McKenna, the move to parity reminds him of a time when he was a boy in the 1960s, selling strawberries to U.S. tourists on the roadside in his native New Brunswick. Back then, the Canadian dollar was worth more than American money.
``It was difficult to make change,'' he recalled. ``So we used to give them a break (and) treat the currencies at par.''
To contact the reporters on this story: Haris Anwar in Toronto at hanwar2@bloomberg.net ; Theophilos Argitis in Ottawa at targitis@bloomberg.net .
Maliki slams US over deaths
BAGHDAD: Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri Al Maliki yesterday suggested the US embassy stop using American security firm Blackwater after a deadly shooting and said he would not allow Iraqis to be killed in "cold blood".
Maliki's call came as US and Iraqi officials agreed to set up a joint commission of inquiry to examine the security of US government-affiliated civilians in Iraq.
The commission, according to an Iraqi government spokesman, is part of efforts to defuse a crisis sparked when Blackwater guards escorting US embassy officials opened fire in a Baghdad neighbourhood, killing 10 people and wounding 13.
Iraq has said it would review the status of all security firms after what it called a flagrant assault by Blackwater contractors in which 11 people were killed while the firm was escorting a US embassy convoy through Baghdad.
With emotions running high, US civilian officials have been barred from road travel in Iraq outside Baghdad's heavily fortified Green Zone because of possible attacks.
The two governments also set up a joint commission to review diplomatic security.
"We will not allow Iraqis to be killed in cold blood ... What happened was a crime. It has left a deep grudge and anger, both inside the government and among the Iraqi people," Maliki said. "It is in (our) interests to freeze the work of this company and the embassy can travel with other companies."
The shooting has incensed Iraqis who regard the tens of thousands of security contractors working in the country as private armies that act with impunity.
At issue for many Iraqis is sovereignty, given that security firms appear to have immunity from Iraqi law under a 2004 regulation written while Iraq was under US administration following the toppling of Saddam Hussein the year before.
The Interior Ministry has said Sunday's incident was sparked when Blackwater guards opened fire indiscriminately after mortar rounds landed near their convoy in western Baghdad.
Blackwater is one of the biggest private security operators in Iraq and protects the US embassy. It said its guards reacted "lawfully and appropriately" to a hostile attack.
Maliki said that account was "not accurate".
Maliki said Blackwater's work had been halted but he did not say its licence had been revoked. He said the Interior Ministry had recorded seven violations against the firm.
The Iraqi government spokesman said the cabinet had backed an Interior Ministry decision to "halt the licence" of Blackwater.
The US embassy in Baghdad said the temporary ban on road travel was imposed to reassess security procedures.
National security adviser Mowaffaq Al Rubaie said the review of security firms would examine their rules of engagement and also the 2004 rule that gave such firms immunity from Iraqi law.
He said there were more than 180 security companies in Iraq. Estimates of the number of security contractors employed by mainly US and European firms range from 25,000 to 48,000.
State Department deputy spokesman Tom Casey said the joint commission would examine "the broader question of security and safety issues" of diplomatic operations in Iraq.
The commission's goal is to make joint policy recommendations, including specific suggestions for improving US and Iraqi procedures regarding government-affiliated personal security details," Casey said.
Maliki has his hands full trying to keep his 16-month-old government together. Around a dozen Shi'ite and Sunni Arab ministers have quit this year.
Maliki proposed forming a cabinet of technocrats and called for greater powers to push through his nominations, alluding to the influence that various political blocs had in naming the current administration.
"Instead of the current number of cabinet ministers we could form a technocratic, smaller government," Maliki said. "To form such a government the prime minister should be given the full authority to nominate the minister he chooses."
Big omission in Bush's Iraq plan
In his address last week on "the way forward in Iraq," President Bush omitted the most important things you need to know.
Most Americans want a strategy that will stabilize Iraq and let us draw down troops without greater chaos. The Petraeus-Crocker testimony to Congress offered tactics that may keep Iraq from crumbling further.
But it was up to the president to present a strategy to hold Iraq together and prevent greater radicalization of the entire region.
Instead, Bush punted. Far from offering a "way forward," his Iraq program will keep the status quo until the mess is dumped on the next president in 2009.
What Bush failed to tell you is where things really stand in Iraq and what must be done to avoid future disasters. The President didn't mention that the upcoming force reductions he announced are not "a return on success," as he claims. They are happening because the Army and Marines have run out of forces.
Ever since the surge began, top military commanders made clear that the 30,000 extra troops were dangerously over-stretching the forces. When I was in Baghdad in June, every senior officer I spoke to said those troops would have to start leaving by March-April of 2008. Otherwise, the military could not maintain its already onerous rotation schedule.
There is heavy and open debate among top military brass about maintaining even post-surge levels. So the President insults the public by pretending the cuts are due to military success. Many commanders believe that even further troop drawdowns will be necessary.
Bush also failed to admit that the basic premise of the surge is failing. The thesis went like this: If the extra troops could tamp down the most egregious sectarian attacks, Iraq's Sunni and Shiite factions would be able to reconcile.
The extra U.S. troops "have made progress" within Sunni and Shiite areas. Extra Marines and U.S. funds have encouraged the movement of Sunni sheikhs against al-Qaida in Iraq (even though this movement started before the new troops arrived).
But the touted progress in Anbar province (which will continue despite the assassination on Thursday of a key sheikh) doesn't help resolve the key problem the Americans face. These Sunni sheikhs and other Sunni dissident groups now working with U.S. troops against AQI are still hostile to the Shiite-led government. That hostility is mutual.
Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker are trying to convince the central government to reach out to Sunnis; they are also trying to persuade both sides to fight for through the political system rather than with guns.
But this presumes Iraqis can be convinced to see their struggle as a rational political competition rather than an existential, zero-sum battle. So far there are few signs that Shiite or Sunni leaders can shift to this kind of thinking. Unless they do, the surge strategy leaves U.S. troops standing between two Iraqi sects that are preparing for a bigger civil war when we exit. And we are now arming both sides.
I don't believe, as do many Democrats, that setting a timeline for U.S. withdrawal will force Iraqis toward political compromise. Just the opposite: A timeline will act like a starting gun that signals all sides should prepare for the bigger battles to come.
But the current surge strategy contains no levers, either, to make reconciliation happen. Iraqis are clearly unable to compromise by themselves, and the administration has had no success in applying pressure. Nor does training Iraqi forces to replace ours offer a good solution; without political reconciliation, those forces will split by sect as soon as American troops leave.
So the most glaring omission in Bush's speech is his failure to address the central question: What is the U.S. strategy to foster political progress inside Iraq, the kind of progress that will enable American troops to go home? There is only one strategy that holds any hope of pressing Iraqi leaders to reach consensus: an international diplomatic offensive, with full U.S. backing, which draws in the permanent security council members, European Union, and all of Iraq's neighbors, including Iran and Syria.
The Iraqi Study Group recommended this, and it has bipartisan support in Congress. As Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., put it to me: "A regional strategy (for Iraq) is imperative and long overdue."
So why has Bush failed to formulate such a strategy? When he introduced the surge last January, the President declared that "we will use America's full diplomatic resources to rally support for Iraq." Yet the administration has only made faint gestures at international diplomacy, and Bush gave it short shrift in his Iraq address.
Perhaps the President believes that promoting diplomacy involves a tacit admission that his policies have failed. Perhaps he's still reluctant to engage more deeply with Damascus or Tehran. Perhaps he believes his own spin.
Yet his surge strategy -- without a major diplomatic push -- is bound for a failure that will become obvious as we approach the 2008 ballot.
A diplomatic surge is the only strategy that holds promise of producing real bipartisan support in Congress. It is the only approach that might push Iraqi factions together and enable a serious U.S. drawdown.
This is what the President didn't and apparently won't tell the American public. But can no one tell him?
Trudy Rubin is a columnist and editorial board member for the Philadelphia Inquirer. E-mail her at trubin@phillynews.com.
U.N. urges more help for Iraq refugees
By LILY HINDY, Associated Press Writer
Tue Sep 18, 8:02 PM ET
UNITED NATIONS - U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said Tuesday that countries involved in the Iraq war have a "moral obligation to do more" to accommodate the growing number of Iraqis fleeing their homeland.
ADVERTISEMENT
The U.N. humanitarian chief, John Holmes, said the United States should allow more Iraqi refugees in, saying Washington was not doing enough about the crisis.
Ban said he planned to bring up the issue in discussions with leaders of countries involved in the war. Many will be attending a high-level meeting on Iraq at U.N. headquarters on Saturday and next week's U.N. General Assembly ministerial meeting.
Neighboring Syria and Jordan were struggling to accommodate fleeing Iraqis at a rate of 15,000 per week, "an enormous number of refugees," Ban said.
"In that regard, parties involved I think have some moral obligation to do more for those refugees," the U.N. chief told a news conference.
Refugee advocacy groups say Iraqis are the fastest growing refugee population in the world and have criticized the U.S. for not shouldering enough of the burden.
According to U.N. statistics, about 1.5 million Iraqi refugees are in Syria, 750,000 in Jordan, 150,000 in Egypt, 50,000 in Iran and 20,000 in Turkey.
Holmes, the undersecretary-general for humanitarian affairs, told the British Broadcasting Corp. in an interview broadcast Tuesday that the U.S. should accept more Iraqi refugees.
"I think they should do more in taking more Iraqis," Holmes said on the BBC's "Hard Talk."
The U.S. has a particular obligation to help those Iraqis whose lives are in danger because they worked with the American government in Iraq, he said.
The Bush administration promised to accept 7,000 Iraqi refugees referred by the U.N. for resettlement during the current budget year, which runs from October 2006 to Sept. 30. But in July, the government announced the number would be closer to 2,000.
Early this month, officials said a total of 719 had been allowed in so far — well below even the 2,000 figure.
American officials have said part of the problem is that the process of identifying Iraqis eligible for resettlement has been slow. But they say efforts are being made to speed it up, including increasing in the number of people conducting security screenings.
Healthcare Debate
For Want of a Dentist
Pr. George's Boy Dies After Bacteria From Tooth Spread to Brain
By Mary Otto
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, February 28, 2007; Page B01
Twelve-year-old Deamonte Driver died of a toothache Sunday.
A routine, $80 tooth extraction might have saved him.
If his mother had been insured.
If his family had not lost its Medicaid.
If Medicaid dentists weren't so hard to find.
If his mother hadn't been focused on getting a dentist for his brother, who had six rotted teeth.
By the time Deamonte's own aching tooth got any attention, the bacteria from the abscess had spread to his brain, doctors said. After two operations and more than six weeks of hospital care, the Prince George's County boy died.
Deamonte's death and the ultimate cost of his care, which could total more than $250,000, underscore an often-overlooked concern in the debate over universal health coverage: dental care.
Some poor children have no dental coverage at all. Others travel three hours to find a dentist willing to take Medicaid patients and accept the incumbent paperwork. And some, including Deamonte's brother, get in for a tooth cleaning but have trouble securing an oral surgeon to fix deeper problems.
In spite of efforts to change the system, fewer than one in three children in Maryland's Medicaid program received any dental service at all in 2005, the latest year for which figures are available from the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
The figures were worse elsewhere in the region. In the District, 29.3 percent got treatment, and in Virginia, 24.3 percent were treated, although all three jurisdictions say they have done a better job reaching children in recent years.
"I certainly hope the state agencies responsible for making sure these children have dental care take note so that Deamonte didn't die in vain," said Laurie Norris, a lawyer for the Baltimore-based Public Justice Center who tried to help the Driver family. "They know there is a problem, and they have not devoted adequate resources to solving it."
P.S. Thank You Ms. Agwu Ogu